Supplements

Passionflower: medicinal plant parts, tea versus extracts, subjective versus measured sleep, a small anxiety comparison, traditional use, and sedation risks

7 sources · Latest source check 2026-10-13 UTC

On this page

Passionflower evidence for sleep or anxiety is limited and preparation-specific. Small studies suggest possible benefits on some measures, but do not establish every claim or equivalence to standard treatment. The medicinal plant discussed here is Passiflora incarnata; a botanical name, route and preparation are needed before comparing products.[1]

Plant, preparation and measurement are different concepts

Plant, preparation and measurement are different concepts
Term	Meaning
Passiflorae herba	Above-ground parts of Passiflora incarnata.[5]
Tea versus extract	Different preparations used in separate studies.[1]
Sleep diary	A participant’s recorded experience of sleep.[2]
Polysomnography / PSG	Overnight physiological sleep measurement.[3]

The tea study used a repeated-measures comparison

Ngan and Conduit’s 2011 double-blind study involved 41 adults aged eighteen to thirty-five. Each participant received passionflower tea and placebo tea in a counterbalanced order, with a one-week washout between treatment periods. Each period lasted a week, with sleep diaries completed throughout. Ten participants also underwent overnight polysomnography.[2]

The main positive result was subjective sleep quality

Of six diary measures analyzed, sleep quality was rated significantly better with passionflower. That finding concerns a participant-reported outcome in healthy adults with mild sleep-quality fluctuations. It is different from demonstrating treatment of a diagnosed insomnia disorder, objective improvement in all sleep measurements or a lasting effect.[2]

A small PSG subgroup is not the full study population

Only ten of the 41 underwent overnight physiological measurement. The original full abstract was inspected, but complete endpoint multiplicity, PSG results, sponsor role and later replication remain to be appraised. The small short comparison cannot determine every tea or extract’s effect.[2]

Total sleep time differed, while some other endpoints did not

The reported total-sleep-time change favored extract over placebo, with P=0.049. Sleep efficiency and wake after sleep onset improved within the extract group, but did not differ significantly from placebo. Quoting those within-group changes as demonstrated treatment superiority would overstate what the comparison established.[3]

Two-week findings do not establish sustained insomnia control

The original full abstract was inspected. Complete clinical-significance, multiple-endpoint, missing-data, safety and sponsor-role appraisal remains pending. A favorable measured endpoint does not demonstrate that symptoms stay improved over months or identify an individual treatment choice.[3]

The anxiety pilot compared two active interventions

Akhondzadeh and colleagues’ 2001 pilot randomized 36 outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder to passionflower extract or oxazepam for four weeks. Each group received a matching placebo for the other formulation, supporting blinding. There was no group receiving only inert placebos. The study therefore used an active comparator rather than a placebo-only efficacy comparison.[4]

No significant difference does not prove equal effectiveness

The investigators reported no significant between-protocol difference at the end of the trial. In a small pilot, that does not establish equivalence or noninferiority within a clinically acceptable margin. Both groups improving does not independently show that the extract exceeds a placebo-only intervention. The authors called for a larger trial.[4]

EMA describes a traditional-use basis for specified purposes

EMA’s public summary describes specified passionflower preparations for mild mental-stress symptoms and aiding sleep on the basis of traditional use. It explicitly notes insufficient clinical-trial evidence for firm conclusions. This medicinal category includes a history of use and plausible effectiveness; it is not the same claim as strong proof from modern randomized comparisons.[5]

The summary does not cover every combination product

EMA’s explanation excludes combinations with other herbs from that particular assessment. It describes age-specific use and a separate periodic-review call in 2025. The indexed original public summary and catalog were inspected; complete assessment, subsequent review outcome and individual national product labeling remain to be reconciled.[5]

Sedation and reproductive concerns remain relevant

NCCIH lists drowsiness, dizziness and confusion, and describes potential additive effects with anesthetic or other sedating medicines. Pregnancy use is a concern because of possible uterine contractions; breastfeeding information is limited. A short trial’s tolerability cannot establish an individual medicine combination or eliminate procedure-related risks.[1]

Short-term procedural anxiety is another distinct question

A placebo-controlled trial randomized sixty patients to a defined oral Passiflora preparation or placebo before outpatient surgery. The authors reported lower anxiety without detected sedation under those conditions. This is a specific premedication setting with clinical monitoring, not a study of daily stress, chronic anxiety disorder, insomnia or self-treatment before an operation. A reassuring short-term assessment does not establish absence of rare adverse effects or interactions with all anesthetic regimens.[6]

Evidence & uncertainty

The two-week insomnia trial favored total measured sleep time. Other within-group improvements did not show superiority to placebo. A positive sleep endpoint therefore should not become a claim that every aspect of insomnia improved.[3]

Selected-source overview · Independent review pending

Published questions

Which plant parts does EMA’s Passiflorae herba assessment describe?

Selected-source overview · Independent review pending. Read the evidence context.

Above-ground Passiflora incarnata parts.[5]

Evidence behind this answer

Passiflorae herba: passion flower herbal medicinal product
agency herbal medicine assessment · Date not stated
Original indexed public-summary/catalog passages inspected; direct retrieval blocked, full assessment and later periodic-review outcome not appraised · Public summary: above-ground parts, traditional-use basis, combination exclusions and 2025 periodic-review catalog