Prevention & care
Common non-melanoma skin cancers: basal and squamous cells, biopsy, and treatment choices
On this page
Basal cell carcinoma and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma are the main cancers grouped under “non-melanoma skin cancer.” They arise in different cells of the skin’s outer layer. This page focuses on those two common diseases; rarer skin malignancies require their own explanations.[1]
Names that describe different findings
| Finding | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Basal cell carcinoma | Cancer beginning in basal cells.[2] |
| Squamous cell carcinoma | Cancer beginning in squamous cells.[2] |
| Actinic keratosis | A precancerous growth that sometimes becomes squamous cell cancer.[4] |
| Squamous cell carcinoma in situ | Cancer confined to the top skin layer; also called Bowen disease.[4] |
Appearance varies across skin tones
AAD describes basal cell cancers as possible bumps, patches or sores; color can vary with skin tone. Squamous cell cancers may look scaly, crusted or dome-shaped, and may bleed, hurt or cause no sensation. Some develop in scars or persistent wounds. Similar-looking marks can have different causes.[3][4]
A persistent or changing lesion deserves assessment
NHS advises assessment for a changing growth, lump or skin area. A sore that does not heal or repeatedly bleeds also merits attention. A clinician can examine the area and decide whether specialist evaluation is needed. Comparing a mark with online pictures cannot supply a tissue diagnosis.[5]
Biopsy and spread testing answer different questions
NHS describes specialist examination and removing tissue for laboratory analysis. Further tests assess spread when appropriate. Many basal cell cancers do not require spread imaging because distant spread is rare; selected squamous cell cancers may need additional investigation. Fewer tests do not necessarily mean that the diagnosis was overlooked.[6]
The same type can have different risk features
AAD explains that depth, differentiation, recurrence and immune status affect concern about squamous cell cancer. People taking immune-suppressing medication after an organ transplant have a higher risk of aggressive disease. “Invasive” means growth beyond the top skin layer; it does not automatically mean distant spread.[4]
Surgery is tailored to the lesion and its site
NHS describes surgery as the main treatment, sometimes with a skin graft or reconstruction. Location, size and disease findings affect the approach. Other options can include radiation or medicines in appropriate settings. A discussion should address removal, recurrence, tissue function, appearance and wound care.[7]
Mohs surgery checks the margins during removal
AAD describes Mohs surgery as removing a visible tumor and a thin surrounding layer, examining the edges under a microscope, and removing further tissue where cancer remains. This can spare uninvolved tissue. It is used in selected settings and is not the appropriate operation for every skin cancer.[3]
A cream or light-based treatment has a specific scope
NHS describes local chemotherapy creams and photodynamic therapy for selected skin cancers. Photodynamic therapy combines a light-sensitive drug with directed light. These approaches are not interchangeable with surgery for every depth or type of disease, nor evidence that general red-light wellness devices treat an undiagnosed growth.[7]
Screening, surveillance and diagnosis have different purposes
NCI reports that population evidence has not established whether skin-cancer screening reduces mortality. That does not cancel evaluation of a concerning lesion. Follow-up after an established skin cancer is another setting: prior disease can affect later risk and the appropriate checking plan.[8]
Risk reduction does not make new changes harmless
NCI identifies UV exposure, sunbeds, prior radiation and immune suppression among relevant risks. Sun protection is useful without guaranteeing that cancer will never occur. A diagnosis should prompt discussion of future skin checks and exposure reduction. These pages do not identify a lesion or choose its treatment.[2]
Evidence & uncertainty
These cancers are often treatable, but behavior varies. Basal cell cancer rarely spreads elsewhere, yet can damage nearby tissue. Squamous cell cancer can sometimes spread. A familiar label, slow growth or reassuring photograph does not establish the risk of a particular lesion.[2][4]
Selected-source overview · Independent review pendingPublished questions
Are basal cell and squamous cell skin cancers the same disease?
Selected-source overview · Independent review pending. Read the evidence context.
They begin in different skin cells and can behave differently.[2]
Evidence behind this answer
- Skin Cancer Treatment (PDQ), Patient Version
agency condition or prevention explanation · Date not stated
Selected relevant original official page passages inspected · Skin-cell origins, spread, actinic keratosis and risk factors
This answer summarizes selected sources. An independent appraisal of the complete evidence has not been completed.
Does rarely spreading make basal cell cancer harmless?
Selected-source overview · Independent review pending. Read the evidence context.
Local growth can still damage nearby tissue.[2]
Evidence behind this answer
- Skin Cancer Treatment (PDQ), Patient Version
agency condition or prevention explanation · Date not stated
Selected relevant original official page passages inspected · Skin-cell origins, spread, actinic keratosis and risk factors
This answer summarizes selected sources. An independent appraisal of the complete evidence has not been completed.
Is actinic keratosis already invasive squamous cell cancer?
Selected-source overview · Independent review pending. Read the evidence context.
It is a precancerous growth; some progress to cancer.[4]
Evidence behind this answer
- Squamous cell carcinoma: From symptoms to treatments
agency condition or prevention explanation · Date not stated
Selected relevant original official page passages inspected · In situ versus invasive disease, differentiation and immune status
This answer summarizes selected sources. An independent appraisal of the complete evidence has not been completed.
Can a photograph establish that a skin growth is benign?
Selected-source overview · Independent review pending. Read the evidence context.
Appearance alone cannot provide a tissue diagnosis.[3]
Evidence behind this answer
- Basal cell carcinoma: From symptoms to treatments
agency condition or prevention explanation · Date not stated
Selected relevant original official page passages inspected · Varied appearances, biopsy and selected uses of Mohs surgery
This answer summarizes selected sources. An independent appraisal of the complete evidence has not been completed.
Is a skin biopsy the same as a scan for spread?
Selected-source overview · Independent review pending. Read the evidence context.
Tissue diagnosis and assessment of spread answer different questions.[6]
Evidence behind this answer
- Tests and next steps for non-melanoma skin cancer
agency condition or prevention explanation · 2026
Selected relevant original official page passages inspected · Specialist examination, biopsy and selected spread testing
This answer summarizes selected sources. An independent appraisal of the complete evidence has not been completed.
Does every non-melanoma skin cancer need Mohs surgery?
Selected-source overview · Independent review pending. Read the evidence context.
Mohs is appropriate in selected settings.[3]
Evidence behind this answer
- Basal cell carcinoma: From symptoms to treatments
agency condition or prevention explanation · Date not stated
Selected relevant original official page passages inspected · Varied appearances, biopsy and selected uses of Mohs surgery
This answer summarizes selected sources. An independent appraisal of the complete evidence has not been completed.
Does photodynamic therapy mean ordinary red-light devices cure skin cancer?
Selected-source overview · Independent review pending. Read the evidence context.
It uses a specific light-sensitive drug and clinical procedure.[7]
Evidence behind this answer
- Treatment for non-melanoma skin cancer
agency condition or prevention explanation · 2026
Selected relevant original official page passages inspected · Surgery, reconstruction, local medicines and photodynamic therapy
This answer summarizes selected sources. An independent appraisal of the complete evidence has not been completed.
Does uncertainty about routine skin screening cancel follow-up after cancer?
Selected-source overview · Independent review pending. Read the evidence context.
Population screening and surveillance are different settings.[8]
Evidence behind this answer
- Skin Cancer Screening (PDQ), Patient Version
agency condition or prevention explanation · Date not stated
Selected relevant original official page passages inspected · Population-screening evidence and follow-up after skin cancer
This answer summarizes selected sources. An independent appraisal of the complete evidence has not been completed.
References
- What is non-melanoma skin cancer?
Agency condition or prevention explanation
NHS · Content/publication date: 2026
Accessed: 2026-10-08 UTC · Selected relevant original official page passages inspected
Cited sections: Basal and squamous cell categories and skin originsReviewed September 2026; this explainer focuses on the two common types.
- Skin Cancer Treatment (PDQ), Patient Version
Agency condition or prevention explanation
National Cancer Institute · Content/publication date: not stated
Accessed: 2026-10-08 UTC · Selected relevant original official page passages inspected
Cited sections: Skin-cell origins, spread, actinic keratosis and risk factorsSelected general concepts, not a treatment ranking.
- Basal cell carcinoma: From symptoms to treatments
Agency condition or prevention explanation
American Academy of Dermatology · Content/publication date: not stated
Accessed: 2026-10-08 UTC · Selected relevant original official page passages inspected
Cited sections: Varied appearances, biopsy and selected uses of Mohs surgeryProcedural explanation does not select an operation.
- Squamous cell carcinoma: From symptoms to treatments
Agency condition or prevention explanation
American Academy of Dermatology · Content/publication date: not stated
Accessed: 2026-10-08 UTC · Selected relevant original official page passages inspected
Cited sections: In situ versus invasive disease, differentiation and immune statusNo personal lesion or recurrence risk is inferred.
- Symptoms of non-melanoma skin cancer
Agency condition or prevention explanation
NHS · Content/publication date: 2026
Accessed: 2026-10-08 UTC · Selected relevant original official page passages inspected
Cited sections: Persistent or changing lesions needing assessmentPictures do not establish or exclude cancer.
- Tests and next steps for non-melanoma skin cancer
Agency condition or prevention explanation
NHS · Content/publication date: 2026
Accessed: 2026-10-08 UTC · Selected relevant original official page passages inspected
Cited sections: Specialist examination, biopsy and selected spread testingReviewed September 2026; testing depends on the finding.
- Treatment for non-melanoma skin cancer
Agency condition or prevention explanation
NHS · Content/publication date: 2026
Accessed: 2026-10-08 UTC · Selected relevant original official page passages inspected
Cited sections: Surgery, reconstruction, local medicines and photodynamic therapyReviewed September 2026; no regimen is selected.
- Skin Cancer Screening (PDQ), Patient Version
Agency condition or prevention explanation
National Cancer Institute · Content/publication date: not stated
Accessed: 2026-10-08 UTC · Selected relevant original official page passages inspected
Cited sections: Population-screening evidence and follow-up after skin cancerEvidence limits differ from diagnostic assessment of a change.
Scope & review
- Population
- General literacy about basal and cutaneous squamous cell cancers across skin tones
- Exposure or intervention
- Changing-lesion assessment, tissue diagnosis, procedures and follow-up
- Comparison
- Source-specific symptom, care, screening or comparator settings
- Outcomes
- Local damage, recurrence, spread, treatment harms and screening mortality
- Timeframe
- New changes, pathology and follow-up; selected 2026 NHS explanations
- Jurisdiction
- Selected US/UK agency and professional guidance; jurisdiction and eligibility differences are labeled
Selected-source educational explanation. Official guidance, original study findings and editorial interpretation are distinguished. No exhaustive search, independent systematic synthesis or qualified medical review has been completed.
Sources checked on their individual access dates. Selected sources were checked; ongoing surveillance and qualified review have separate statuses on the coverage page.
Revision history
- 2026-10-08 UTC: Added a sourced explanation in a bounded ten-article batch; qualified review remains pending.
What this article still leaves open
- Independent clinical review, complete high-risk treatment evidence and all rarer skin cancers remain incomplete.
- No photograph, home treatment or population-screening conclusion supplies a personal lesion diagnosis.
Suggest a correction
Submit a content correction to the editorial queue, or download a local note. Leave out personal medical details. Submitted text is stored privately with a browser receipt session and is visible to this browser and the editor. Clearing cookies removes access to your submission history. This is not an account or a medical service.
Your submitted corrections for this article
Explore the topic map
Browse the health domains connected to this article. The map also identifies topics whose articles remain unwritten.