Health Atlas
Menu
Evidence-led reference

Prevention & care

Anal fissure: a tear versus hemorrhoids, acute and chronic disease, stool care, medicines, surgery, and continence

6 sources · Latest source check 2026-10-13 UTC
On this page

An anal fissure is a small tear in the lining at the anal opening. It commonly causes sharp pain when passing stool, pain afterward and bright-red bleeding. This is a different lesion from hemorrhoids. A familiar symptom pattern helps assessment, but rectal pain or bleeding still requires the correct cause to be identified.[1]

The categories change the question

The categories change the question
CategoryMeaning
AcuteASCRS defines symptoms present for less than six weeks.[3]
ChronicLonger duration, often with characteristic examination findings.[3]
AtypicalAn unusual location or pattern requiring broader investigation.[2]
HemorrhoidsAnother possible cause of anal symptoms, rather than a synonym for a tear.[1]

Hard stools and diarrhea can both cause local injury

ASCRS explains a cycle in which injury produces pain, internal sphincter spasm and reduced local blood flow, impairing healing. A hard, dry bowel movement is one trigger, but loose stools can also cause injury. This explains why treating the bowel pattern and reducing muscle spasm can address different parts of the same problem.[3]

Persistent or unusual symptoms need another look

ASCRS advises re-examination when conservative measures fail. Crohn’s disease, infection and anal tumors can produce similar symptoms. Fissures outside the usual midline location particularly need further assessment. A fissure does not itself become colorectal cancer, but finding one does not establish that all current or future bleeding has that explanation.[2]

Nonoperative care aims to make bowel movements less traumatic

The NHS describes maintaining soft stools, adequate fluid and fiber, appropriate treatment of constipation and warm baths for comfort. A clinician may prescribe a stool-softening treatment. Pain can make people reluctant to pass stool, which can complicate bowel habits. The goal is sustained improvement in the stool pattern and healing, not simply suppressing one painful episode.[1]

Prescription creams act on muscle tone and have different harms

ASCRS describes topical nitrates and calcium-channel blockers such as diltiazem or nifedipine as sphincter-relaxing treatments. Headache and lowered blood pressure can occur, particularly with nitrates. A topical formulation is not interchangeable with an oral medicine used for another condition. Choice, preparation and monitoring depend on a clinician’s assessment and local availability.[2]

The 2020 topical-treatment review did not establish superior healing

Nine randomized trials compared topical diltiazem with glyceryl trinitrate for chronic fissures. The healing analysis included 379 and 351 patients respectively: pooled risk ratio 1.04, 95% confidence interval 0.93–1.16. The interval includes no difference, so the review does not demonstrate that diltiazem heals more fissures.[4]

Headaches were less frequent with diltiazem, while four trials suggested lower late recurrence. Trials varied in treatment duration, follow-up and reported methods. The review’s table often leaves funding or blinding unspecified, and it reports no financial support for the review. Short-term healing, tolerability and long-term recurrence are distinct outcomes.[4]

The 2023 guideline distinguishes acute care and selected chronic treatment

ASCRS searched adult English-language literature through March 2022. It supports nonoperative care initially for acute fissures, and recognizes topical calcium-channel blockers as having similar healing to nitrates with a better adverse-effect profile. Its recommendations synthesize prior studies and clinical judgment; this Atlas explanation has not independently repeated that assessment.[3]

Healing and continence are both important outcomes

Botulinum toxin relaxes the sphincter through injection. Lateral internal sphincterotomy divides part of that muscle; it is an option for selected chronic fissures. ASCRS emphasizes existing incontinence, obstetric sphincter injury, prior anorectal surgery and inflammatory bowel disease when considering surgery. Tailored division can reduce continence harms relative to a longer division.[3]

Symptom relief and tissue healing have different timelines

ASCRS describes pain improving before complete healing in some treated patients. A healed fissure may recur after another injurious bowel movement. Maintaining appropriate bowel habits and reassessing unexplained recurrence remain relevant after a successful treatment, rather than assuming that one procedure answers every future anal symptom.[2]

Duration, appearance and location describe different categories

The Italian guideline describes acute fissures as present for less than six weeks and chronic fissures as longer-lasting tears with changes such as thickened edges or an accompanying skin tag. Typical fissures are usually solitary and lie in the midline. Multiple or off-midline fissures are atypical and can warrant investigation for another condition. These categories answer separate questions: duration helps describe healing, while location and number influence whether the presumed cause needs reconsideration.[6]

Cutting muscle and preserving muscle have different tradeoffs

Sphincterotomy divides part of the internal anal sphincter to reduce resting pressure. Tailored sphincterotomy limits the extent of that division. Fissurectomy removes diseased tissue, and advancement flaps cover a defect with nearby tissue. The guideline favors treatment matched to sphincter tone, previous injury and continence risk. A high average healing rate cannot remove an individual’s concern about leakage, and evidence for some tissue-preserving alternatives is less extensive or less consistent.[6]

Evidence & uncertainty

Acute fissures often improve with nonoperative care. Chronic disease can require treatment that relaxes the internal anal sphincter. Surgery can heal more reliably, but continence risks and the patient’s existing sphincter function matter. Published treatment findings should therefore be read as benefit–harm comparisons, rather than a universal sequence for every person.[5]

Selected-source overview · Independent review pending

Published questions

Is an anal fissure the same lesion as hemorrhoids?

Selected-source overview · Independent review pending. Read the evidence context.

A fissure is a tear.[1]

Evidence behind this answer
  • Anal fissure

    agency condition or prevention explanation · 2025
    Selected relevant original official page passages inspected · June 2025: tear, symptoms, bowel care and assessment

This answer summarizes selected sources. An independent appraisal of the complete evidence has not been completed.

Can diarrhea as well as hard stool contribute to a fissure?

Selected-source overview · Independent review pending. Read the evidence context.

Both can injure the lining.[2]

Evidence behind this answer
  • Anal Fissure Expanded Information

    professional association explanation · Date not stated
    Selected relevant original official page passages inspected · Definition, injury/spasm cycle, atypical symptoms, prescription harms, recurrence and healing

This answer summarizes selected sources. An independent appraisal of the complete evidence has not been completed.

What duration does ASCRS use to define an acute anal fissure?

Selected-source overview · Independent review pending. Read the evidence context.

Symptoms for less than six weeks.[3]

Evidence behind this answer
  • Management of Anal Fissures (2023)

    professional guideline · 2023
    Original guideline methods, definitions and selected recommendations inspected; full independent evidence appraisal pending · 2023: March 2022 search, acute/chronic definitions, topical and selected surgical recommendations

This answer summarizes selected sources. An independent appraisal of the complete evidence has not been completed.

Does an unusual fissure location need broader investigation?

Selected-source overview · Independent review pending. Read the evidence context.

ASCRS recommends further assessment.[2]

Evidence behind this answer
  • Anal Fissure Expanded Information

    professional association explanation · Date not stated
    Selected relevant original official page passages inspected · Definition, injury/spasm cycle, atypical symptoms, prescription harms, recurrence and healing

This answer summarizes selected sources. An independent appraisal of the complete evidence has not been completed.

Did the 2020 diltiazem review demonstrate clearly better healing than GTN?

Selected-source overview · Independent review pending. Read the evidence context.

Its healing confidence interval included no difference.[4]

Evidence behind this answer

This answer summarizes selected sources. An independent appraisal of the complete evidence has not been completed.

Did the topical review find fewer headaches with diltiazem?

Selected-source overview · Independent review pending. Read the evidence context.

Yes.[4]

Evidence behind this answer

This answer summarizes selected sources. An independent appraisal of the complete evidence has not been completed.

Does the Cochrane page’s 2022 citation mean its search ended in 2022?

Selected-source overview · Independent review pending. Read the evidence context.

Its described search ended in 2010.[5]

Evidence behind this answer
  • Non surgical therapy for anal fissure

    systematic review · 2022
    Original indexed review summary and selected methods/results inspected; no independent full-text appraisal · 2022 page citation but August 2010 search; exclusions and medical/surgical comparison

This answer summarizes selected sources. An independent appraisal of the complete evidence has not been completed.

Does existing continence or sphincter injury matter for fissure surgery?

Selected-source overview · Independent review pending. Read the evidence context.

It affects treatment selection.[3]

Evidence behind this answer
  • Management of Anal Fissures (2023)

    professional guideline · 2023
    Original guideline methods, definitions and selected recommendations inspected; full independent evidence appraisal pending · 2023: March 2022 search, acute/chronic definitions, topical and selected surgical recommendations

This answer summarizes selected sources. An independent appraisal of the complete evidence has not been completed.

The broad Cochrane summary contains older searches

The page cites a 2022 publication, but describes searches ending in August 2010. It compares many medical treatments and surgery across heterogeneous trials. It found medical treatment less effective than sphincterotomy for chronic adult fissures, with different harms. The site’s publication date should not be mistaken for a 2022 evidence-search cutoff.[5]

Atypical fissures associated with inflammatory bowel disease, cancer or anal infection were excluded. Its estimates therefore do not directly establish the best approach to those conditions. A broad historical review and a focused later topical review can overlap in trials; they should not be counted as completely independent confirmations.[5]

References

  1. Anal fissure

    Agency condition or prevention explanation

    NHS · Content/publication date: 2025
    Accessed: 2026-10-09 UTC · Selected relevant original official page passages inspected
    Cited sections: June 2025: tear, symptoms, bowel care and assessment

  2. Anal Fissure Expanded Information

    Professional association explanation

    American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons · Content/publication date: not stated
    Accessed: 2026-10-09 UTC · Selected relevant original official page passages inspected
    Cited sections: Definition, injury/spasm cycle, atypical symptoms, prescription harms, recurrence and healing

    Clinical content date not verified; general postoperative timelines are not individual predictions.

  3. Management of Anal Fissures (2023)

    Professional guideline

    Davids JS and colleagues / ASCRS · Content/publication date: 2023
    Accessed: 2026-10-09 UTC · Original guideline methods, definitions and selected recommendations inspected; full independent evidence appraisal pending
    Cited sections: 2023: March 2022 search, acute/chronic definitions, topical and selected surgical recommendations

    Legacy toolkit moved; destination guideline read. No guideline funding or related competing interests reported.

  4. Topical diltiazem and glyceryl-trinitrate for chronic anal fissure: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

    Systematic review

    Nevins EJ and Kanakala V · Content/publication date: 2020
    Accessed: 2026-10-09 UTC · Original indexed review summary and selected methods/results inspected; no independent full-text appraisal
    Cited sections: 2020: nine trials, healing denominator, headache/recurrence, methods and funding table

    Trial totals and analyzed outcome totals differ; healing uses 379/351. No review financial support reported.

  5. Non surgical therapy for anal fissure

    Systematic review

    Nelson RL, Thomas K, Morgan J, Jones A / Cochrane · Content/publication date: 2022
    Accessed: 2026-10-09 UTC · Original indexed review summary and selected methods/results inspected; no independent full-text appraisal
    Cited sections: 2022 page citation but August 2010 search; exclusions and medical/surgical comparison

    Historical evidence search; excludes atypical IBD, cancer and infection-associated fissures. Newer syntheses and trial overlap not fully appraised.

  6. SIUCP guidelines for management of anal fissure

    Professional guidance

    Brillantino A and SIUCP guideline panel · Content/publication date: 2023
    Accessed: 2026-10-13 UTC · Relevant original guideline text retrieved and inspected
    Cited sections: Introduction: acute/chronic, typical/atypical; procedural sections: tailored sphincterotomy and sphincter-preserving options

    Professional guidance reflects its stated populations and evidence date.

Scope & review

Population
Readers exploring typical anal fissures; atypical causes and baseline continence change applicability
Exposure or intervention
Definition, stool care, topical treatment evidence, procedures and adverse effects
Comparison
Source-specific symptom, care, screening or comparator settings
Outcomes
Pain, healing, headaches, recurrence and control of gas/stool
Timeframe
Acute/chronic presentation and variable treatment/healing follow-up
Jurisdiction
Selected US/UK agency and US/European professional guidance; jurisdiction and eligibility differences are labeled

Selected-source educational explanation. Official guidance, original study findings and editorial interpretation are distinguished. No exhaustive search, independent systematic synthesis or qualified medical review has been completed.

Sources checked on their individual access dates. Selected sources were checked; ongoing surveillance and qualified review have separate statuses on the coverage page.

Revision history
  • 2026-10-09 UTC: Added a sourced explanation in a bounded ten-article batch; qualified review remains pending.
  • 2026-10-13 UTC: Added category explanation and guideline tradeoffs; original anchors preserved.

What this article still leaves open

  • Contemporary botulinum, tailored sphincterotomy, flap and long-term continence trials require complete appraisal.
  • Atypical fissures, obstetric injury, pediatric disease, treatment interactions and trial overlap need expansion.
  • Qualified review, personal bleeding diagnosis and medicine or procedural selection are not supplied.
Suggest a correction

Submit a content correction to the editorial queue, or download a local note. Leave out personal medical details. Submitted text is stored privately with a browser receipt session and is visible to this browser and the editor. Clearing cookies removes access to your submission history. This is not an account or a medical service.

Explore the topic map

Browse the health domains connected to this article. The map also identifies topics whose articles remain unwritten.