Health Atlas
Menu
Evidence-led reference

Prevention & care

Advance directives: living wills, proxies, medical orders and planning outcomes

10 sources · Latest source check 2026-10-20 UTC
On this page

Advance directives record healthcare wishes or designate a person to help decide when someone cannot make the relevant decisions. Advance care planning is the broader process of discussing goals and preparing for future care. A completed document is one part of that process.[1]

Documents and discussions serve different purposes

Documents and discussions serve different purposes
CategoryMeaningBoundary
Living willRecords treatment wishes for specified future circumstancesDifferent from naming a decision maker[1]
Healthcare power of attorneyNames a proxy for healthcare decisionsRules and activation requirements differ[1][2]
POLSTPortable medical orders for serious illness or advanced frailtyCompleted with and signed by a clinician[4]
Planning conversationExplores wishes, goals and optionsDoes not automatically create a valid legal document[2]

Choosing a proxy involves communication

NIA’s proxy worksheet asks whether a person can talk comfortably with the proposed proxy about wishes and priorities. The role is not simply a name entered on a form. Discuss what matters, likely situations and how to contact the care team. The worksheet helps prepare that conversation; it does not determine legal eligibility or guarantee that a proxy will predict every future preference. Check the locally applicable appointment requirements and make sure the person understands the role.[3]

A portable order is not a form for everyone

National POLST describes its forms as medical orders for people with serious illness or advanced frailty. The provider should discuss diagnosis, prognosis, options and goals, then complete and sign the order. It can address resuscitation, hospitalization and intensive treatment. A healthy person ordinarily needs advance planning rather than a POLST form. Local programs use different names and signature requirements. The categories should be clarified with the care team instead of assuming every planning document gives the same emergency instructions.[4]

Review whether the recorded wishes still fit

Preferences can change. The Office of the Public Guardian’s England-and-Wales explanation advises keeping an advance refusal up to date. Conduct clearly inconsistent with an old refusal, or a later lasting power of attorney covering that treatment, can affect its validity. Discuss a changed plan with the relevant professionals rather than assuming that the oldest document always governs. This is a local framework, not a worldwide form-validity rule.[9]

Consider what happens if the chosen agent cannot act

New York’s official health-care proxy booklet allows an alternate agent when the first agent is unavailable, unable or unwilling to act. Discuss the role with the people you propose and check the applicable form and local requirements. A backup appointment is different from assuming that any relative can take over automatically.[10]

Evidence & uncertainty

Planning can improve communication and documentation, but those are different outcomes from receiving the care a person wants. A 2025 cluster trial increased recorded preferences while also increasing potentially burdensome end-of-life care in its specified decedent subgroup.[5][6]

Selected-source overview · Independent review pending

Published questions

Is a living will the same as naming a medical decision maker?

Selected-source overview · Independent review pending. Read the evidence context.

No. A living will records treatment wishes; a healthcare power of attorney names a proxy. They can complement each other but perform different roles. Ask which locally valid document serves each purpose.[1]

Evidence behind this answer
  • Advance Care Planning: Advance Directives for Health Care

    agency explanation · 2022
    Original indexed official or research passages inspected; direct full-text access unavailable or not independently appraised · Original indexed definitions of living will and healthcare power of attorney

This answer summarizes selected sources. An independent appraisal of the complete evidence has not been completed.

Does a healthcare proxy automatically manage finances?

Selected-source overview · Independent review pending. Read the evidence context.

No. The encyclopedia separates healthcare authority from general financial or legal authority. Estate and financial arrangements need their own applicable documents.[2]

Evidence behind this answer
  • Advance care directives

    medical reference explanation · Date not stated
    Selected relevant original official passages or original methods/results inspected; no independent full-document appraisal · Healthcare versus financial authority; state-law requirements; document roles

This answer summarizes selected sources. An independent appraisal of the complete evidence has not been completed.

Should every healthy adult fill out a POLST independently?

Selected-source overview · Independent review pending. Read the evidence context.

No. National POLST describes a clinician-completed medical order for serious illness or advanced frailty. A healthy person should distinguish advance planning from that medical-order process.[4]

Evidence behind this answer
  • Patient FAQs

    professional program guidance · Date not stated
    Selected relevant original official passages or original methods/results inspected; no independent full-document appraisal · Medical-order purpose; serious illness/frailty; provider conversation and signatures

This answer summarizes selected sources. An independent appraisal of the complete evidence has not been completed.

What should be discussed with a proposed proxy?

Selected-source overview · Independent review pending. Read the evidence context.

Discuss wishes, priorities and whether the person is comfortable speaking about them. NIA’s worksheet supports preparing this conversation; it does not substitute for the local appointment requirements.[3]

Evidence behind this answer

This answer summarizes selected sources. An independent appraisal of the complete evidence has not been completed.

Does more planning paperwork prove better end-of-life care?

Selected-source overview · Independent review pending. Read the evidence context.

No. Documentation and later care are different outcomes. The cluster trial improved recorded preferences but had mixed downstream findings. That does not make a form useless or determine what care any individual wants.[6]

Evidence behind this answer

This answer summarizes selected sources. An independent appraisal of the complete evidence has not been completed.

Is completing the document enough if nobody knows where it is?

Selected-source overview · Independent review pending. Read the evidence context.

Share accessible copies with the proxy and care team, using the service’s process. NIA recommends safe storage and giving copies to relevant people. Keeping wishes available is part of planning.[7][8]

Evidence behind this answer
  • Preparing a Living Will

    agency explanation · Date not stated
    Original indexed official or research passages inspected; direct full-text access unavailable or not independently appraised · Indexed official storage and sharing advice

  • Advance Care Planning and Health Care Decisions: Tips for Caregivers and Families

    agency explanation · Date not stated
    Original indexed official or research passages inspected; direct full-text access unavailable or not independently appraised · Indexed official copies and proxy-contact advice

This answer summarizes selected sources. An independent appraisal of the complete evidence has not been completed.

Why review an advance refusal when my wishes or arrangements change?

Selected-source overview · Independent review pending. Read the evidence context.

England-and-Wales guidance advises keeping it current. Changed wishes or a later lasting power of attorney covering the same treatment can affect the old refusal; discuss updates under the relevant local framework.[9]

Evidence behind this answer
  • Making decisions about your health, welfare or finances

    official public guidance · 2025-05-23
    Selected complete original Section 5 and jurisdiction/date passages read. The page retains older implementation material elsewhere; unrelated organizational, telephone and legal claims were not adopted. · Section 5: keeping an advance decision up to date; changed conduct or later LPA

This answer summarizes selected sources. An independent appraisal of the complete evidence has not been completed.

Can I name a backup healthcare agent?

Selected-source overview · Independent review pending. Read the evidence context.

Some jurisdictions provide for this. New York’s official proxy form permits an alternate if the first agent is unavailable, unable or unwilling. Check your local appointment rules.[10]

Evidence behind this answer
  • Health Care Proxy: Appointing Your Health Care Agent in New York State

    official form and patient guidance · Date not stated
    Original eight-page booklet retrieved; relevant alternate-agent FAQ, introductory scope and form instructions read. Native PDF fetch returned 403; no precise publication date inferred. · Frequently Asked Questions: agent unavailable; proxy form optional alternate-agent field

This answer summarizes selected sources. An independent appraisal of the complete evidence has not been completed.

A better conversation is not the same as a guaranteed endpoint

A 2022 systematic review examined 132 randomized trials published through May 2021. It found stronger evidence for proximal outcomes such as communication than for many later patient outcomes. Only twelve trials assessed end-of-life care consistent with preferences, and three reported improvement. Different interventions, settings and measurements limit a single summary. This dated review does not establish that planning lacks value; it shows why recording a form, improving discussion and achieving goal-concordant care should be evaluated separately.[5]

Later trial findings make the outcome distinction concrete

The SHARING Choices cluster trial compared a multicomponent primary-care program with usual care for adults aged sixty-five and older. New preferences were recorded for 12.0% versus 6.6% of eligible patients without baseline documentation. Potentially burdensome care in the final six months of life was assessed among Maryland residents with serious illness who died within eighteen months of entry. It occurred in 28.8% versus 20.9% (adjusted odds ratio 1.40; 95% confidence interval 1.08–1.81). Coded potentially burdensome care did not establish whether each person’s care was unwanted. These outcomes challenge the assumption that more documentation alone guarantees better care.[6]

Documents need to be available and current

NIA advises giving copies of completed living-will documents to the proxy and healthcare provider and storing them safely. Its caregiver guidance also recommends sharing the proxy’s contact details with the people providing care. A form left somewhere inaccessible may be less useful during a crisis. Discuss how the service stores and finds documents and what to do after changes. Availability supports communication; it does not guarantee a future treatment outcome or replace the clinical discussion.[7][8]

References

  1. Advance Care Planning: Advance Directives for Health Care

    Agency explanation

    NIH NIA · Content/publication date: 2022
    Accessed: 2026-10-13 UTC · Original indexed official or research passages inspected; direct full-text access unavailable or not independently appraised
    Cited sections: Original indexed definitions of living will and healthcare power of attorney

    Direct retrieval returned 405; definitions checked in official indexed excerpts.

  2. Worksheet: Who Should I Choose as My Health Care Proxy?

    Agency explanation

    NIH NIA · Content/publication date: 2023
    Accessed: 2026-10-13 UTC · Original indexed official or research passages inspected; direct full-text access unavailable or not independently appraised
    Cited sections: Comfort discussing wishes and priorities

  3. Patient FAQs

    Professional program guidance

    National POLST Collaborative · Content/publication date: not stated
    Accessed: 2026-10-13 UTC · Selected relevant original official passages or original methods/results inspected; no independent full-document appraisal
    Cited sections: Medical-order purpose; serious illness/frailty; provider conversation and signatures

  4. What is the evidence for efficacy of advance care planning in improving patient outcomes?

    Systematic review

    Malhotra and colleagues / BMJ Open · Content/publication date: 2022
    Accessed: 2026-10-13 UTC · Original indexed official or research passages inspected; direct full-text access unavailable or not independently appraised
    Cited sections: 132 RCTs; search through May 2021; proximal and distal outcome distinctions

    Direct PMC retrieval returned a browser challenge; original indexed results inspected.

  5. Advance Care Planning, End-of-Life Preferences, and Burdensome Care

    Cluster randomized trial

    Wolff and colleagues / JAMA Internal Medicine · Content/publication date: 2025
    Accessed: 2026-10-13 UTC · Selected relevant original official passages or original methods/results inspected; no independent full-document appraisal
    Cited sections: Original abstract: cluster design, documentation and decedent outcomes

  6. Preparing a Living Will

    Agency explanation

    NIH NIA · Content/publication date: not stated
    Accessed: 2026-10-13 UTC · Original indexed official or research passages inspected; direct full-text access unavailable or not independently appraised
    Cited sections: Indexed official storage and sharing advice

    Direct retrieval required a browser challenge.

  7. Advance Care Planning and Health Care Decisions: Tips for Caregivers and Families

    Agency explanation

    NIH NIA · Content/publication date: not stated
    Accessed: 2026-10-13 UTC · Original indexed official or research passages inspected; direct full-text access unavailable or not independently appraised
    Cited sections: Indexed official copies and proxy-contact advice

    Direct retrieval returned 405.

  8. Making decisions about your health, welfare or finances

    Official public guidance

    Office of the Public Guardian, England and Wales · Content/publication date: 2025-05-23
    Accessed: 2026-10-20 UTC · Selected complete original Section 5 and jurisdiction/date passages read. The page retains older implementation material elsewhere; unrelated organizational, telephone and legal claims were not adopted.
    Cited sections: Section 5: keeping an advance decision up to date; changed conduct or later LPA

  9. Health Care Proxy: Appointing Your Health Care Agent in New York State

    Official form and patient guidance

    New York State Department of Health · Content/publication date: not stated
    Accessed: 2026-10-20 UTC · Original eight-page booklet retrieved; relevant alternate-agent FAQ, introductory scope and form instructions read. Native PDF fetch returned 403; no precise publication date inferred.
    Cited sections: Frequently Asked Questions: agent unavailable; proxy form optional alternate-agent field

Scope & review

Population
General readers; study populations, eligibility and jurisdiction are specified in the explanation
Exposure or intervention
Advance directives
Comparison
Treatment-wish documents versus proxy appointment and portable medical orders; planning programs versus usual care in selected trials
Outcomes
Understanding care choices, communication, documentation and source-specific findings
Timeframe
Dated guidance and selected research; not an individual clinical, financial or legal determination
Jurisdiction
US insurance and advance-planning examples; UK consent guidance and international decision-support research are labeled separately. Local law and plan requirements differ.

Selected-source educational explanation. Official guidance, original study findings and editorial interpretation are distinguished. No exhaustive search, independent systematic synthesis or qualified medical review has been completed.

Sources checked on their individual access dates. Selected sources were checked; ongoing surveillance and qualified review have separate statuses on the coverage page.

Revision history
  • 2026-10-13 UTC: Added an educational guide to healthcare choices, with selective source access and qualified-review gaps recorded.
  • 2026-10-20 UTC: Added narrowly scoped practical care explanations and distinct sourced questions after complete adjacent-body audit; old section, FAQ, source, intro and evidence-note objects preserved as exact prefixes. Qualified review remains pending.

What this article still leaves open

  • Which current local forms and signature requirements apply?
  • Which planning supports improve patient-valued downstream care rather than documentation alone?
Suggest a correction

Submit a content correction to the editorial queue, or download a local note. Leave out personal medical details. Submitted text is stored privately with a browser receipt session and is visible to this browser and the editor. Clearing cookies removes access to your submission history. This is not an account or a medical service.

Explore the topic map

Browse the health domains connected to this article. The map also identifies topics whose articles remain unwritten.